• Complex
  • Title
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
  • Scholars
  • Journal
  • ISSN
  • Conference
成果搜索

author:

Luo, Shezhou (Luo, Shezhou.) [1] | Wang, Cheng (Wang, Cheng.) [2] | Xi, Xiaohuan (Xi, Xiaohuan.) [3] | Pan, Feifei (Pan, Feifei.) [4] | Peng, Dailiang (Peng, Dailiang.) [5] | Zou, Jie (Zou, Jie.) [6] | Nie, Sheng (Nie, Sheng.) [7] | Qin, Haiming (Qin, Haiming.) [8]

Indexed by:

EI

Abstract:

Vegetation biomass is a key biophysical parameter for many ecological and environmental models. The accurate estimation of biomass is essential for improving the accuracy and applicability of these models. Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data have been extensively used to estimate forest biomass. Recently, there has been an increasing interest in fusing LiDAR with other data sources for directly measuring or estimating vegetation characteristics. In this study, the potential of fused LiDAR and hyperspectral data for biomass estimation was tested in the middle Heihe River Basin, northwest China. A series of LiDAR and hyperspectral metrics were calculated to obtain the optimal biomass estimation model. To assess the prediction ability of the fused data, single and fused LiDAR and hyperspectral metrics were regressed against field-observed belowground biomass (BGB), aboveground biomass (AGB) and total forest biomass (TB). The partial least squares (PLS) regression method was used to reduce the multicollinearity problem associated with the input metrics. It was found that the estimation accuracy of forest biomass was affected by LiDAR plot size, and the optimal plot size in this study had a radius of 22 m. The results showed that LiDAR data alone could estimate biomass with a relative high accuracy, and hyperspectral data had lower prediction ability for forest biomass estimation than LiDAR data. The best estimation model was using a fusion of LiDAR and hyperspectral metrics (R2 = 0.785, 0.893 and 0.882 for BGB, AGB and TB, respectively, with p 2 by 5.8%, 2.2% and 2.6%, decreased AIC value by 1.9%, 1.1% and 1.2%, and reduced RMSE by 8.6%, 7.9% and 8.3% for BGB, AGB and TB, respectively. These results demonstrated that biomass accuracies could be improved by the use of fused LiDAR and hyperspectral data, although the improvement was slight when compared with LiDAR data alone. This slight improvement could be attributed to the complementary information contained in LiDAR and hyperspectral data. In conclusion, fusion of LiDAR and other remotely sensed data has great potential for improving biomass estimation accuracy. © 2016 Elsevier Ltd

Keyword:

Biomass Forecasting Forestry Fusion reactions Least squares approximations Optical radar Regression analysis Remote sensing Spectroscopy Vegetation

Community:

  • [ 1 ] [Luo, Shezhou]Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing; 100094, China
  • [ 2 ] [Luo, Shezhou]Department of Geography and Program in Planning, University of Toronto, Toronto; ON; M5S 3G3, Canada
  • [ 3 ] [Wang, Cheng]Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing; 100094, China
  • [ 4 ] [Xi, Xiaohuan]Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing; 100094, China
  • [ 5 ] [Pan, Feifei]Department of Geography and the Environment, University of North Texas, Denton; TX; 76203, United States
  • [ 6 ] [Peng, Dailiang]Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing; 100094, China
  • [ 7 ] [Zou, Jie]Key Laboratory of Data Mining and Information Sharing, Ministry of Education, Spatial Information Research Center of Fujian Province, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou; 350002, China
  • [ 8 ] [Nie, Sheng]Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing; 100094, China
  • [ 9 ] [Qin, Haiming]Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing; 100094, China

Reprint 's Address:

  • [wang, cheng]key laboratory of digital earth science, institute of remote sensing and digital earth, chinese academy of sciences, beijing; 100094, china

Show more details

Related Keywords:

Source :

Ecological Indicators

ISSN: 1470-160X

Year: 2017

Volume: 73

Page: 378-387

3 . 9 8 3

JCR@2017

7 . 0 0 0

JCR@2023

ESI HC Threshold:247

JCR Journal Grade:1

CAS Journal Grade:2

Cited Count:

WoS CC Cited Count:

SCOPUS Cited Count: 106

ESI Highly Cited Papers on the List: 0 Unfold All

WanFang Cited Count:

Chinese Cited Count:

30 Days PV: 0

Affiliated Colleges:

Online/Total:35/10106623
Address:FZU Library(No.2 Xuyuan Road, Fuzhou, Fujian, PRC Post Code:350116) Contact Us:0591-22865326
Copyright:FZU Library Technical Support:Beijing Aegean Software Co., Ltd. 闽ICP备05005463号-1