Because　of　the　continuous　burst　of　emergency　events　(EEs)　recently,　emergency　decision　making　(EDM)　has　become　an　active　research　topic　due　to　its　crucial　role　in　relieving　and　reducing　various　losses　and　damages　(property,　lives,　environment,　etc.)　caused　by　EEs.　Current　EDM　studies　based　on　prospect　theory　(PT)　have　considered　decision　maker＇s　(DM＇s)　psychological　behavior,　which　is　very　important　in　the　EDM　process　because　it　affects　DM＇s　decision　behavior　directly,　particularly　under　the　uncertainty　decision　environment.　However,　those　studies　neglected　an　important　fact　that　different　emergency　situations　should　be　handled　by　different　measures　to　show　the　pertinence　and　effectiveness　of　the　emergency　response　in　the　real　world,　which　has　been　taken　into　consideration　in　EDM　studies　based　on　game　theory　(GT).　Different　behavior　experiments　show　that　DMs　usually　have　limited　rationality　when　involved　in　risk　and　an　uncertain　decision　environment,　in　which　their　psychological　behavior　has　distinct　impacts　on　their　decision　choice　and　behavior.　Nevertheless,　the　existing　studies　of　EDM　based　on　GT　build　on　an　assumption　that　DMs　are　totally　rational;　however,　it　is　obvious　that　such　an　assumption　is　unreasonable　and　far　from　the　real-world　situation.　Motivated　by　these　limitations　pointed　out　previously,　this　study　proposes　a　novel　EDM　method　combining　GT　and　PT　that　considers　not　only　the　DM＇s　psychological　behavior,　but　also　takes　different　situations＇　handling　for　EEs　into　account,　which　is　closer　to　the　EDM　problems　in　reality.　An　example　and　comparison　with　other　methods　are　provided　to　demonstrate　the　validity　and　rationality　of　the　proposed　method　for　coping　with　real-world　EDM　problems.