Query：
学者姓名：王志玮
Refining：
Year
Type
Indexed by
Source
Complex
Former Name
Co-
Language
Clean All
Abstract ：
在创新生态系统情境下,生态系统合法性的获取及演化是创业企业成功开展颠覆性创新的有效机制.通过对迈新1993-2023年的纵向案例分析发现,创业企业通过生态系统合法性实现颠覆性创新的过程,实际上是创业企业围绕颠覆性的价值主张构建创新生态系统,并不断克服各种生态系统合法性障碍,逐步得到创新生态系统内外部行动者的理解和认可,最终实现对现有生态系统价值主张的颠覆或部分替代的过程.在此期间,生态系统合法性经历了"规范""认知"和"价值"维度的演化,并依次通过"行为""话语"和"意义"合法化策略获取相应的合法性.研究结论对于创业企业成功开展颠覆性创新具有重要见解.
Keyword ：
创业企业 创业企业 创新生态系统 创新生态系统 生态系统合法性 生态系统合法性 颠覆性创新 颠覆性创新
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | 何郁冰 , 叶凌峰 , 王志玮 et al. 创业企业如何成功开展颠覆性创新? [J]. | 科学学研究 , 2024 , 42 (10) : 2216-2227 . |
| MLA | 何郁冰 et al. "创业企业如何成功开展颠覆性创新?" . | 科学学研究 42 . 10 (2024) : 2216-2227 . |
| APA | 何郁冰 , 叶凌峰 , 王志玮 , 林齐心 . 创业企业如何成功开展颠覆性创新? . | 科学学研究 , 2024 , 42 (10) , 2216-2227 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
The emergence of disruptive innovation is an important and highly researched field. In the context of innovation ecosystem, the acquisition and its evolution of ecosystem legitimacy is an effective mechanism for start-ups to successfully carry out disruptive innovation. Prior research has shown that disruptive innovation is a socialized process that involves collaboration and dynamic interaction of multiple actors. Therefore, start-ups usually need to be embedded in a suitable innovation ecosystem for acquiring relevant resources and capabilities, in order to realize disruptive innovation through value co-creation. However, startups that introduce disruptive innovations into an existing ecosystem usually face the liability of newness including customer indifference, incumbent skepticism, and lack of co-specialized assets, which will undermine the efforts and effects of disruptive innovations carried out by start-ups. As a result, in order to successfully carry out disruptive innovation, start-ups usually have to acquire ecosystem legitimacy, that is, to obtain the support from actors inside and outside the ecosystem or even incumbents that may be disrupted. However, it is worth considering that there is currently a lack of relevant research on how start-ups in emerging economies achieve disruptive innovations through acquiring ecosystem legitimacy. Although the last few years have seen a boom in the study of the relationship between innovation ecosystem and disruptive innovation, most of that are usually based on the assumption that disruptive innovation has already occurred. Existing research focus mainly on the strategic response of incumbents to the challenge of being disrupted, with fewer studies analyzing the ecosystem legitimacy of disruptive innovation carried out by start-ups. Using the method of longitudinal case study, this paper explores the detailed process of how start-ups in emerging economies achieve disruptive innovation by acquiring the ecosystem legitimacy. According to the principle of theoretical sampling, Fuzhou Maixin Biotechnology Development Co., Ltd. was selected as the case study sample. First, Maixin Biotechnology has successfully achieved disruptive innovation and realized the transition from entrepreneur to leader. Second, Maixin Biotechnology has finally disrupted or partially replaced the existing ecosystem value proposition by constructing the ecosystem legitimacy. Moreover, Maixin Biotechnology has greatly enhanced its disruptive innovation capability through the ecological legitimation strategies. Through the longitudinal case analysis of Maixin Biotechnology from 1993 to 2023, this paper finds that Maixin Biotechnology builds an innovation ecosystem around a disruptive value proposition, and constantly overcomes various obstacles to ecosystem legitimacy during this period, so as to gradually get the understanding and recognition of internal and external actors of the ecosystem. By acquiring ecosystem legitimacy, Maixin has ultimately succeeded in disrupting or partially replacing the value proposition of existing innovation ecosystems. In the process of building innovation ecosystems to carry out disruptive innovation, the ecosystem legitimacy construction of start-ups has experienced a dynamic evolution from performative legitimation, cognitive legitimation to value proposition legitimacy. Accordingly, start-ups could acquire ecosystem legitimacy through the phases of behavioral legitimization, discursive legitimation, and meaningful legitimization in that order. This paper introduces the perspective of ecosystem legitimacy which enriches the disruptive innovation theory of start-ups in emerging economies. Based on the context of Chinese startups, this paper proposes a formation path of disruptive innovation through the acquisition of ecosystem legitimacy. This paper not only makes up for the traditional deficiency from the single perspective of incumbents to examine disruptive innovation, but also provides a new mechanism for disruptive innovation of Chinese start-ups. The conclusion has also important enlightenment for the disruptive innovation practice of start-ups in emerging economies and the construction of scientific and technological powerhouse of China. © 2024 Editorial Department of Studies in Science of Science. All rights reserved.
Keyword ：
disruptive innovation disruptive innovation ecosystem legitimacy ecosystem legitimacy innovation ecosystem innovation ecosystem start-ups start-ups
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | He, Y.-B. , Ye, L.-F. , Wang, Z.-W. et al. How start-ups successfully carry out disruptive innovation: A case study based on the perspective of ecosystem legitimacy; [创业企业如何成功开展颠覆性创新? ———生态系统合法性视角的案例研究] [J]. | Studies in Science of Science , 2024 , 42 (10) : 2216-2227 . |
| MLA | He, Y.-B. et al. "How start-ups successfully carry out disruptive innovation: A case study based on the perspective of ecosystem legitimacy; [创业企业如何成功开展颠覆性创新? ———生态系统合法性视角的案例研究]" . | Studies in Science of Science 42 . 10 (2024) : 2216-2227 . |
| APA | He, Y.-B. , Ye, L.-F. , Wang, Z.-W. , Lin, Q.-X. . How start-ups successfully carry out disruptive innovation: A case study based on the perspective of ecosystem legitimacy; [创业企业如何成功开展颠覆性创新? ———生态系统合法性视角的案例研究] . | Studies in Science of Science , 2024 , 42 (10) , 2216-2227 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
遵循情境化研究思路,探讨了在科技驱动型和经验驱动型行业中探索性学习、利用性学习以及两者交互效应对企业颠覆性创新绩效的影响.基于208家企业样本数据的实证研究发现:探索性学习正向影响颠覆性创新绩效;利用性学习对颠覆性创新绩效无显著影响;在科技驱动型行业中,探索性与利用性学习的交互作用负向影响颠覆性创新绩效;而在经验驱动型行业中,两类学习的交互作用正向影响颠覆性创新绩效.
Keyword ：
创新绩效 创新绩效 利用性学习 利用性学习 双元学习 双元学习 探索性学习 探索性学习 颠覆性创新 颠覆性创新
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | 王志玮 , 魏丽灿 , 叶凌峰 et al. 组织双元学习对企业颠覆性创新绩效的影响——STI与DUI的对比研究 [J]. | 创新与创业管理 , 2022 , (1) : 139-152 . |
| MLA | 王志玮 et al. "组织双元学习对企业颠覆性创新绩效的影响——STI与DUI的对比研究" . | 创新与创业管理 1 (2022) : 139-152 . |
| APA | 王志玮 , 魏丽灿 , 叶凌峰 , 林宇晗 . 组织双元学习对企业颠覆性创新绩效的影响——STI与DUI的对比研究 . | 创新与创业管理 , 2022 , (1) , 139-152 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
Drawing on signaling theory, peer effect, and the awareness-motivation-capability (AMC) framework, we examine the role of strategic emerging industries (SEI) firms in raising the awareness and motivation of non-SEI firms' R&D activities, including gaining government R&D subsidies and adopting internal R&D investment, while considering the moderate effect of non-SEI firms' capability factor. Based on the data of Chinese listed firms from SEI and non-SEI, the empirical results reveal that (a) the number of SEI firms funded by government R&D has an inverted U-shape relationship with the amount that non-SEI firms gain from government R&D subsidies, and has a positive relationship with the investment of non-SEI firms on internal R&D. (b) The financial performance of SEI firms funded by government R&D motivates non-SEI firms to gain government R&D subsidies and invest in internal R&D. (c) These relationships are strengthened by the relative scale of the non-SEI firms.
Keyword ：
AMC framework AMC framework government R&D subsidies government R&D subsidies internal R&D investment internal R&D investment peer effect peer effect signal theory signal theory Strategic emerging industries Strategic emerging industries
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | Hu, Die , Wang, Zhiwei , Hu, Huifang . How do firms in strategic emerging industries influence their peers' innovation strategies? [J]. | ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA , 2021 . |
| MLA | Hu, Die et al. "How do firms in strategic emerging industries influence their peers' innovation strategies?" . | ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA (2021) . |
| APA | Hu, Die , Wang, Zhiwei , Hu, Huifang . How do firms in strategic emerging industries influence their peers' innovation strategies? . | ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA , 2021 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
Although teamwork shows stronger innovation ability than individuals and this advantage has been increasing over time, the negative effects of larger teams also appear as the number of inventor members increases. This study discusses the double-edged sword role of inventor teams in innovation quality at two extremes: the high quality and the low quality. We argue that, inventor team size influences innovation quality because diversity works in the evolutionary process of innovation, but different types of diversity play distinct moderating roles in these relationships. Using patent data from the US pharmaceutical industry, empirical results show that there is an inverted U-shape relationship between inventor team size and high-quality innovation, and a negative relationship between inventor team size and low-quality innovation. These relationships are moderated at different degree by technological and geographic diversity. Our findings contribute to existing literature of innovation and also provide meaningful implications for innovation management.
Keyword ：
collaboration collaboration diversity diversity high-quality innovation high-quality innovation inventor team size inventor team size low-quality innovation low-quality innovation
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | Hu, Die , She, Maoyan , Ye, Lingfeng et al. The more the merrier? Inventor team size, diversity, and innovation quality [J]. | SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY , 2021 , 48 (4) : 508-520 . |
| MLA | Hu, Die et al. "The more the merrier? Inventor team size, diversity, and innovation quality" . | SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY 48 . 4 (2021) : 508-520 . |
| APA | Hu, Die , She, Maoyan , Ye, Lingfeng , Wang, Zhiwei . The more the merrier? Inventor team size, diversity, and innovation quality . | SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY , 2021 , 48 (4) , 508-520 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
设计思维(Design Thinking)作为全球创新创业者的共同语言,是一种"以人为本"寻找正确的问题、探寻问题的根源、找到复杂问题创新解决方案的思维方式、流程、工具和方法论.起源于西方的设计思维与我国的双创教育虽然在本质上高度契合,但设计思维对我国大学生创新创业能力的培育是否有效?如果有效,是如何起作用的?这些研究问题尚不明确.本文基于全国948名大学生的问卷调查研究,采用结构方程模型进行实证分析,结果表明:对设计思维的培育能显著提升我国大学生创新创业能力;设计思维的同理心(移情)、知识整合两个维度,通过创造力自我效能感的部分中介作用,对大学生创新创业能力产生正向影响.实证研究结论为如何通过大学生的设计思维培训,提升其创造力自信、培育创新创业能力、推进我国高校创新创业教育、培养高素质的"三创型"人才,提供理论依据与实践指导.
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | 王志玮 , 魏丽灿 , 廖烁颖 et al. 设计思维对大学生创新创业能力的影响研究 ——基于创造力自我效能感的中介机制 [J]. | 创新科技 , 2021 , 21 (4) : 85-91 . |
| MLA | 王志玮 et al. "设计思维对大学生创新创业能力的影响研究 ——基于创造力自我效能感的中介机制" . | 创新科技 21 . 4 (2021) : 85-91 . |
| APA | 王志玮 , 魏丽灿 , 廖烁颖 , 林宇晗 , 吴清 . 设计思维对大学生创新创业能力的影响研究 ——基于创造力自我效能感的中介机制 . | 创新科技 , 2021 , 21 (4) , 85-91 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
What are the driving factors of disruptive innovations in emerging economies from a network perspective? We argue that three forms of absorptive capacity (i.e. exploratory, exploitative and transformative learning) mediate the relationship between a firm's network relations and disruptive innovations. We tested the hypotheses with a survey of 251 firms in China and iterated the conceptual model to reflect the crucial insight that disrupters in emerging economies can leap from exploratory learning to disruptive innovation. We surmise exploratory learning help disrupters outsource transformative and exploitative learning via their supply chains. Suggestions for future research and limitations are also discussed.
Keyword ：
Absorptive capacity Absorptive capacity Disruptive innovation Disruptive innovation Relational embeddedness Relational embeddedness
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | Wang, Zhiwei , Ling, Juan , Chok, Jay, I . Relational embeddedness and disruptive innovations: The mediating role of absorptive capacity [J]. | JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT , 2020 , 57 . |
| MLA | Wang, Zhiwei et al. "Relational embeddedness and disruptive innovations: The mediating role of absorptive capacity" . | JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT 57 (2020) . |
| APA | Wang, Zhiwei , Ling, Juan , Chok, Jay, I . Relational embeddedness and disruptive innovations: The mediating role of absorptive capacity . | JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT , 2020 , 57 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
颠覆性创新是我国后发企业实现跨越式追赶的重要路径,既有文献对于其驱动因素讨论的不充分限制了其对企业实践的指导作用.从颠覆性创新的驱动力视角出发,探究设计与颠覆性创新之间的关系及其内在作用机理.研究认为:基于"意义"维度,颠覆性创新可以划分为原有意义系统颠覆性创新和新意义系统颠覆性创新;不同类型的设计对颠覆性创新驱动机理不同,具体而言,产品功能设计通过功能—成本联动创新满足了低端和边缘市场消费者被过度服务和尚未被满足的需求,从而实现了原有意义系统颠覆性创新;而产品语义设计则通过技术—社会文化要素联动创新为消费者提供象征性和情感性价值,满足他们情感和社会文化需求,从而实现新意义系统颠覆性创新.
Keyword ：
原有意义系统颠覆性创新 原有意义系统颠覆性创新 新意义系统颠覆性创新 新意义系统颠覆性创新 设计驱动创新 设计驱动创新 颠覆性创新 颠覆性创新
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | 王志玮 , 叶凌峰 . 基于设计驱动的颠覆性创新机理研究 [J]. | 创新科技 , 2020 , 20 (5) : 28-37 . |
| MLA | 王志玮 et al. "基于设计驱动的颠覆性创新机理研究" . | 创新科技 20 . 5 (2020) : 28-37 . |
| APA | 王志玮 , 叶凌峰 . 基于设计驱动的颠覆性创新机理研究 . | 创新科技 , 2020 , 20 (5) , 28-37 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
立足中国情境,对某通信产品企业间合作创新开展纵向案例研究,刻画了门径管理流程中合作双方企业的具体创新行为,并梳理、归纳和构建了基于企业间合作创新的新产品开发门径管理模型。
Keyword ：
合作创新 合作创新 新产品开发 新产品开发 门径管理 门径管理
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | 王志玮 , 裴娇梅 , 施超娴 . 基于合作创新的移动互联网企业门径管理 [J]. | 创新与创业管理 , 2019 , (2) : 49-61 . |
| MLA | 王志玮 et al. "基于合作创新的移动互联网企业门径管理" . | 创新与创业管理 2 (2019) : 49-61 . |
| APA | 王志玮 , 裴娇梅 , 施超娴 . 基于合作创新的移动互联网企业门径管理 . | 创新与创业管理 , 2019 , (2) , 49-61 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
采用单案例纵向研究的方法,考察了MX公司24年破坏性技术创业过程及其不同成长阶段的合法性要求以及获取途径,并构建了破坏性技术创业合法化的理论模型.结果发现:中国情境下的破坏性技术创业注重技术与市场的匹配,并通过后续的渐进改善实现对主流市场的颠覆,其成长路径经历了"非主流市场→技术积累→主流市场"的过程.此外,破坏性技术创业在构思阶段、商业化阶段和成长阶段等3个不同时期中,合法性要求及其获取途径皆存在动态差异性.合法性要求从规范合法性演变为认知合法性,最后演变成规制合法性.相应地,破坏性技术创业企业可以依次通过采取选择环境、控制环境和依从环境的策略来获取相应的合法性,从而获得成长所需的资源.
Keyword ：
合法性 合法性 合法性获取 合法性获取 破坏性技术创业 破坏性技术创业 转型经济 转型经济
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | 王志玮 , 叶凌峰 , 吴清 et al. 转型经济下破坏性技术创业及其合法性演化研究 ——MX公司纵向案例分析 [J]. | 科学学与科学技术管理 , 2018 , 39 (8) : 100-114 . |
| MLA | 王志玮 et al. "转型经济下破坏性技术创业及其合法性演化研究 ——MX公司纵向案例分析" . | 科学学与科学技术管理 39 . 8 (2018) : 100-114 . |
| APA | 王志玮 , 叶凌峰 , 吴清 , 吴炳德 . 转型经济下破坏性技术创业及其合法性演化研究 ——MX公司纵向案例分析 . | 科学学与科学技术管理 , 2018 , 39 (8) , 100-114 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Export
| Results： |
Selected to |
| Format： |
