Query：
学者姓名：何郁冰
Refining：
Year
Type
Indexed by
Source
Complex
Former Name
Co-
Language
Clean All
Abstract ：
基于创新采用的分析框架,从创新的相对性出发,提出了一种同时满足创新的内部特征和外部特征的颠覆性技术识别方法.首先,分别使用BERTopic主题模型、专利信息挖掘技术获取新技术功能、不连续的技术标准,识别颠覆性技术的创新内部特征;其次,使用CD指数衡量专利的颠覆性潜力,识别颠覆性技术的创新外部特征;然后,识别出同时满足创新内部和外部特征的颠覆性技术,划分出新市场、低端和高端的颠覆性技术;最后,以储能领域专利为例,验证识别方法的可行性和有效性.该方法能将颠覆性技术的定义与识别进行匹配,体现出技术创新和市场采纳的相互作用,区分不同类型的颠覆性技术,为企业确定一项新技术是否产生颠覆性影响提供了参考.
Keyword ：
BERTopic BERTopic CD指数 CD指数 专利文本挖掘 专利文本挖掘 创新采用 创新采用 颠覆性技术识别 颠覆性技术识别
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | 何郁冰 , 徐美娟 , 荆晶 . 基于创新采用框架的颠覆性技术识别研究 [J]. | 科学学研究 , 2025 , 43 (1) : 66-78 . |
| MLA | 何郁冰 等. "基于创新采用框架的颠覆性技术识别研究" . | 科学学研究 43 . 1 (2025) : 66-78 . |
| APA | 何郁冰 , 徐美娟 , 荆晶 . 基于创新采用框架的颠覆性技术识别研究 . | 科学学研究 , 2025 , 43 (1) , 66-78 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
颠覆性创新是企业实现追赶的重要手段,对企业获得持久竞争优势具有重要指导意义.针对现有研究呈现分散、矛盾的现状,通过文献计量和内容分析,对1995-2022年国内外颠覆性创新文献进行分析,并构建包括核心内涵、研究视角和研究方法的知识框架,归纳热点问题和规律.研究发现颠覆性创新研究发文量呈稳步上升态势,但与国外相比国内文献数量与其差距逐渐增大且机构间合作较少;国内外研究热点主题具有较大共性,重点集中在技术识别、影响因素和模式机制,但在研究问题侧重上存在差异.此外,颠覆性创新概念边界模糊,可从特征、结果、过程多角度定义;研究视角主要围绕技术、组织、战略、市场展开;研究方法则以案例研究为主,逐渐向多种定量方法扩展.
Keyword ：
文献计量 文献计量 演进 演进 知识框架 知识框架 颠覆性创新 颠覆性创新
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | 何郁冰 , 荆晶 . 国内外颠覆性创新研究演进脉络及知识框架 [J]. | 技术经济与管理研究 , 2025 , (1) : 15-22 . |
| MLA | 何郁冰 等. "国内外颠覆性创新研究演进脉络及知识框架" . | 技术经济与管理研究 1 (2025) : 15-22 . |
| APA | 何郁冰 , 荆晶 . 国内外颠覆性创新研究演进脉络及知识框架 . | 技术经济与管理研究 , 2025 , (1) , 15-22 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
颠覆性创新具有高不确定性和高风险性，其实现过程受到企业内外部多种因素驱动。本文基于“技术-组织-环境”框架，从创新生态视角出发，通过模糊集定性比较分析方法，探究人工智能企业嵌入创新生态系统的生态关系和生态环境驱动颠覆性创新实现的组态路径。研究发现，在平稳的市场环境中，企业与多类型组织研发合作获得的互补和邻近技术知识能够实现高颠覆性创新；在活跃的市场环境中，企业基于研发合作或供应链关系吸收邻近技术知识有利于颠覆性创新。制度环境始终为颠覆性创新提供保障和支撑。同时，在特定情境下，知识产权保护和政府政策支持、研发合作关系和供应链关系具有互补替代效应。研究结论为企业在创新生态系统中通过关系构建和要素组合实现颠覆性创新提供决策参考。
Keyword ：
TOE框架 TOE框架 人工智能企业 人工智能企业 创新生态 创新生态 制度环境 制度环境 知识产权 知识产权 研发合作 研发合作 组态理论 组态理论 颠覆性创新 颠覆性创新
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | 何郁冰 , 荆晶 . 基于TOE框架的人工智能企业颠覆性创新驱动因素研究——创新生态视角 [J]. | 工业技术经济 , 2025 , 44 (06) : 99-108 . |
| MLA | 何郁冰 等. "基于TOE框架的人工智能企业颠覆性创新驱动因素研究——创新生态视角" . | 工业技术经济 44 . 06 (2025) : 99-108 . |
| APA | 何郁冰 , 荆晶 . 基于TOE框架的人工智能企业颠覆性创新驱动因素研究——创新生态视角 . | 工业技术经济 , 2025 , 44 (06) , 99-108 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
基于2009～2021年中国电动汽车行业相关上市公司的数据，以“充电基础设施建设”政策为准自然实验，应用双重差分法实证检验了互补者激励与车企颠覆性创新之间的关系。研究发现：相对于非实行政策城市中的企业，“充电基础设施建设”政策的推行使得实行政策城市中的车企在颠覆性技术创新和颠覆性产品创新方面表现更为活跃；机制分析表明，“充电基础设施建设”政策引致的互补者激励，主要通过增强新技术研发、提高产业链合作关系稳定性的方式促进了车企的颠覆性创新；异质性分析表明，该项政策对车企颠覆性创新的影响在高管团队是否有研发背景、不同产业链关联度、不同城市基建水平的企业以及不同产业链位置的企业中存在显著差异，具有选择效应。
Keyword ：
中国电动汽车产业 中国电动汽车产业 互补者激励 互补者激励 充电基础设施建设 充电基础设施建设 颠覆性创新 颠覆性创新
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | 林婷 , 何郁冰 . 互补者激励对企业颠覆性创新的影响研究 [J]. | 管理学报 , 2025 , 22 (05) : 887-896 . |
| MLA | 林婷 等. "互补者激励对企业颠覆性创新的影响研究" . | 管理学报 22 . 05 (2025) : 887-896 . |
| APA | 林婷 , 何郁冰 . 互补者激励对企业颠覆性创新的影响研究 . | 管理学报 , 2025 , 22 (05) , 887-896 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
在创新生态系统情境下,生态系统合法性的获取及演化是创业企业成功开展颠覆性创新的有效机制.通过对迈新1993-2023年的纵向案例分析发现,创业企业通过生态系统合法性实现颠覆性创新的过程,实际上是创业企业围绕颠覆性的价值主张构建创新生态系统,并不断克服各种生态系统合法性障碍,逐步得到创新生态系统内外部行动者的理解和认可,最终实现对现有生态系统价值主张的颠覆或部分替代的过程.在此期间,生态系统合法性经历了"规范""认知"和"价值"维度的演化,并依次通过"行为""话语"和"意义"合法化策略获取相应的合法性.研究结论对于创业企业成功开展颠覆性创新具有重要见解.
Keyword ：
创业企业 创业企业 创新生态系统 创新生态系统 生态系统合法性 生态系统合法性 颠覆性创新 颠覆性创新
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | 何郁冰 , 叶凌峰 , 王志玮 et al. 创业企业如何成功开展颠覆性创新? [J]. | 科学学研究 , 2024 , 42 (10) : 2216-2227 . |
| MLA | 何郁冰 et al. "创业企业如何成功开展颠覆性创新?" . | 科学学研究 42 . 10 (2024) : 2216-2227 . |
| APA | 何郁冰 , 叶凌峰 , 王志玮 , 林齐心 . 创业企业如何成功开展颠覆性创新? . | 科学学研究 , 2024 , 42 (10) , 2216-2227 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
基于联盟组合多样性构成视角,探讨联盟组合中"伙伴—功能—治理"多样性对企业持续创新的影响,以及结构洞、互补资产对二者关系的调节作用,并利用2013-2017年101家中国深市创业板上市公司面板数据进行实证检验.结果表明:伙伴多样性、功能多样性和治理多样性对企业持续创新具有不同程度的影响;互补资产正向调节功能多样性与持续创新的关系,对"治理多样性—持续创新"关系发挥负向调节作用;结构洞负向调节功能多样性与持续创新的关系,对"治理多样性—持续创新"关系发挥正向调节作用.
Keyword ：
互补资产 互补资产 持续创新 持续创新 结构洞 结构洞 联盟组合多样性 联盟组合多样性 调节作用 调节作用
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | 何郁冰 , 占加峰 . 联盟组合多样性对企业持续创新的影响 [J]. | 科技进步与对策 , 2024 , 41 (5) : 60-69 . |
| MLA | 何郁冰 et al. "联盟组合多样性对企业持续创新的影响" . | 科技进步与对策 41 . 5 (2024) : 60-69 . |
| APA | 何郁冰 , 占加峰 . 联盟组合多样性对企业持续创新的影响 . | 科技进步与对策 , 2024 , 41 (5) , 60-69 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
PurposeDisruptive innovation is regarded as an important engine of the new technological revolution, which can change the traditional market structure and business model completely. Articles on disruptive innovation remain fragmented and heterogeneous in terms of theoretical paradigms and empirical studies. For the purpose of further understanding about disruptive innovation, and to recognize its evolutionary trajectory and research trends, this paper provides a systematic literature review.Design/methodology/approachBased on data from Web of Science a total of 1,415 articles were collected to identify productive countries, prominent journals, influential authors and main sub-fields on disruptive innovation. Additionally, important articles are analyzed for content.FindingsThere is an overall increasing trend in the number of articles, a uniformity of highly productive authors and countries and a primary concentration in business and management journals. Moreover, six research clusters are identified and an antecedent-decision-outcome framework is constructed to categorize significant studies.Practical implicationsThis paper outlines the key focuses of the field: application and adoption of disruptive technology, identifying and responding to disruptive innovation, commercialization of disruptive technology, disruptive innovation strategies and disruptive business models.Originality/valueThis paper combines bibliometrics and content analysis to systematically overview disruptive innovation research.
Keyword ：
Bibliometric Bibliometric Disruptive innovation Disruptive innovation Intellectual structure Intellectual structure Review Review
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | He, Yubing , Jing, Jing . Intellectual structure of disruptive innovation: a bibliometric analysis and systematic review [J]. | JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT , 2024 , 37 (6) : 1382-1402 . |
| MLA | He, Yubing et al. "Intellectual structure of disruptive innovation: a bibliometric analysis and systematic review" . | JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT 37 . 6 (2024) : 1382-1402 . |
| APA | He, Yubing , Jing, Jing . Intellectual structure of disruptive innovation: a bibliometric analysis and systematic review . | JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT , 2024 , 37 (6) , 1382-1402 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
针对颠覆性技术的侵蚀性与不确定性特征,结合复杂网络与演化博弈理论,设计了基于复杂网络的演化博弈模型,运用计算机仿真方法对颠覆性技术扩散特点进行考察.结果表明,颠覆性技术在新兴企业之间的扩散具有相对稳定性,但对在位企业之间的扩散表现出不可预测性;技术颠覆潜力和侵蚀能力的提高均无法保证颠覆性技术的完全扩散;网络结构特征对颠覆性技术的扩散效果影响显著.
Keyword ：
复杂网络 复杂网络 技术扩散 技术扩散 演化博弈 演化博弈 颠覆性技术 颠覆性技术
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | 何郁冰 , 林欣慧 . 基于复杂网络演化博弈的颠覆性技术扩散研究 [J]. | 软科学 , 2024 , 38 (6) : 28-36 . |
| MLA | 何郁冰 et al. "基于复杂网络演化博弈的颠覆性技术扩散研究" . | 软科学 38 . 6 (2024) : 28-36 . |
| APA | 何郁冰 , 林欣慧 . 基于复杂网络演化博弈的颠覆性技术扩散研究 . | 软科学 , 2024 , 38 (6) , 28-36 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
The emergence of disruptive innovation is an important and highly researched field. In the context of innovation ecosystem, the acquisition and its evolution of ecosystem legitimacy is an effective mechanism for start-ups to successfully carry out disruptive innovation. Prior research has shown that disruptive innovation is a socialized process that involves collaboration and dynamic interaction of multiple actors. Therefore, start-ups usually need to be embedded in a suitable innovation ecosystem for acquiring relevant resources and capabilities, in order to realize disruptive innovation through value co-creation. However, startups that introduce disruptive innovations into an existing ecosystem usually face the liability of newness including customer indifference, incumbent skepticism, and lack of co-specialized assets, which will undermine the efforts and effects of disruptive innovations carried out by start-ups. As a result, in order to successfully carry out disruptive innovation, start-ups usually have to acquire ecosystem legitimacy, that is, to obtain the support from actors inside and outside the ecosystem or even incumbents that may be disrupted. However, it is worth considering that there is currently a lack of relevant research on how start-ups in emerging economies achieve disruptive innovations through acquiring ecosystem legitimacy. Although the last few years have seen a boom in the study of the relationship between innovation ecosystem and disruptive innovation, most of that are usually based on the assumption that disruptive innovation has already occurred. Existing research focus mainly on the strategic response of incumbents to the challenge of being disrupted, with fewer studies analyzing the ecosystem legitimacy of disruptive innovation carried out by start-ups. Using the method of longitudinal case study, this paper explores the detailed process of how start-ups in emerging economies achieve disruptive innovation by acquiring the ecosystem legitimacy. According to the principle of theoretical sampling, Fuzhou Maixin Biotechnology Development Co., Ltd. was selected as the case study sample. First, Maixin Biotechnology has successfully achieved disruptive innovation and realized the transition from entrepreneur to leader. Second, Maixin Biotechnology has finally disrupted or partially replaced the existing ecosystem value proposition by constructing the ecosystem legitimacy. Moreover, Maixin Biotechnology has greatly enhanced its disruptive innovation capability through the ecological legitimation strategies. Through the longitudinal case analysis of Maixin Biotechnology from 1993 to 2023, this paper finds that Maixin Biotechnology builds an innovation ecosystem around a disruptive value proposition, and constantly overcomes various obstacles to ecosystem legitimacy during this period, so as to gradually get the understanding and recognition of internal and external actors of the ecosystem. By acquiring ecosystem legitimacy, Maixin has ultimately succeeded in disrupting or partially replacing the value proposition of existing innovation ecosystems. In the process of building innovation ecosystems to carry out disruptive innovation, the ecosystem legitimacy construction of start-ups has experienced a dynamic evolution from performative legitimation, cognitive legitimation to value proposition legitimacy. Accordingly, start-ups could acquire ecosystem legitimacy through the phases of behavioral legitimization, discursive legitimation, and meaningful legitimization in that order. This paper introduces the perspective of ecosystem legitimacy which enriches the disruptive innovation theory of start-ups in emerging economies. Based on the context of Chinese startups, this paper proposes a formation path of disruptive innovation through the acquisition of ecosystem legitimacy. This paper not only makes up for the traditional deficiency from the single perspective of incumbents to examine disruptive innovation, but also provides a new mechanism for disruptive innovation of Chinese start-ups. The conclusion has also important enlightenment for the disruptive innovation practice of start-ups in emerging economies and the construction of scientific and technological powerhouse of China. © 2024 Editorial Department of Studies in Science of Science. All rights reserved.
Keyword ：
disruptive innovation disruptive innovation ecosystem legitimacy ecosystem legitimacy innovation ecosystem innovation ecosystem start-ups start-ups
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | He, Y.-B. , Ye, L.-F. , Wang, Z.-W. et al. How start-ups successfully carry out disruptive innovation: A case study based on the perspective of ecosystem legitimacy; [创业企业如何成功开展颠覆性创新? ———生态系统合法性视角的案例研究] [J]. | Studies in Science of Science , 2024 , 42 (10) : 2216-2227 . |
| MLA | He, Y.-B. et al. "How start-ups successfully carry out disruptive innovation: A case study based on the perspective of ecosystem legitimacy; [创业企业如何成功开展颠覆性创新? ———生态系统合法性视角的案例研究]" . | Studies in Science of Science 42 . 10 (2024) : 2216-2227 . |
| APA | He, Y.-B. , Ye, L.-F. , Wang, Z.-W. , Lin, Q.-X. . How start-ups successfully carry out disruptive innovation: A case study based on the perspective of ecosystem legitimacy; [创业企业如何成功开展颠覆性创新? ———生态系统合法性视角的案例研究] . | Studies in Science of Science , 2024 , 42 (10) , 2216-2227 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
Based on the perspective of ecological efficiency, this paper divides the innovation process of industrial innovation ecosystem into three stages: Assimilation, growth and utilization, and constructs an evaluation index system of industrial innovation ecosystem efficiency. The Super-SBM model and Malmquist index method are used to measure the innovation ecosystem efficiency of 15 high-tech industries in China, and relevant efficiency improvement paths are proposed. The research results show that the efficiency of China’s high-tech industry innovation ecosystem is at a medium level, with an overall trend of continuous growth. The differences and polarization among industries are significant, and further coordinated development is needed. There are significant differences in the efficiency of the three stages, with the highest utilization efficiency, the second highest growth efficiency and the lowest assimilation efficiency. In the evolutionary trend, the assimilation efficiency has the fastest growth rate, utilization efficiency is the second, and growth efficiency is the slowest (negative growth). Combined with the difference of industrial efficiency in different stages, it is found that the 'double three-high' efficiency industry has not yet formed, which cannot play the leading and promoting role of 'innovation ecological effect'. The efficiency of China’s high-tech industry innovation ecosystem can be characterized by four types: high efficiency - fast growth, low efficiency - fast growth, low efficiency - slow growth, and high efficiency - slow growth. Different types of industries can improve the efficiency of innovation ecosystem through process optimization, mechanism improvement, and bilateral breakthrough. © 2024 Systems Engineering Society of China. All rights reserved.
Keyword ：
Ecosystems Ecosystems Efficiency Efficiency Optimization Optimization
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | He, Yubing , Zhang, Si , Lin, Ting . Research on efficiency measurement of China’s high-tech industry innovation ecosystem and its improvement path [J]. | System Engineering Theory and Practice , 2024 , 44 (2) : 546-562 . |
| MLA | He, Yubing et al. "Research on efficiency measurement of China’s high-tech industry innovation ecosystem and its improvement path" . | System Engineering Theory and Practice 44 . 2 (2024) : 546-562 . |
| APA | He, Yubing , Zhang, Si , Lin, Ting . Research on efficiency measurement of China’s high-tech industry innovation ecosystem and its improvement path . | System Engineering Theory and Practice , 2024 , 44 (2) , 546-562 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Export
| Results： |
Selected to |
| Format： |
