Query：
学者姓名：何郁冰
Refining：
Year
Type
Indexed by
Source
Complex
Former Name
Co-
Language
Clean All
Abstract ：
颠覆性创新是企业实现追赶的重要手段,对企业获得持久竞争优势具有重要指导意义.针对现有研究呈现分散、矛盾的现状,通过文献计量和内容分析,对1995-2022年国内外颠覆性创新文献进行分析,并构建包括核心内涵、研究视角和研究方法的知识框架,归纳热点问题和规律.研究发现颠覆性创新研究发文量呈稳步上升态势,但与国外相比国内文献数量与其差距逐渐增大且机构间合作较少;国内外研究热点主题具有较大共性,重点集中在技术识别、影响因素和模式机制,但在研究问题侧重上存在差异.此外,颠覆性创新概念边界模糊,可从特征、结果、过程多角度定义;研究视角主要围绕技术、组织、战略、市场展开;研究方法则以案例研究为主,逐渐向多种定量方法扩展.
Keyword ：
文献计量 文献计量 演进 演进 知识框架 知识框架 颠覆性创新 颠覆性创新
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | 何郁冰 , 荆晶 . 国内外颠覆性创新研究演进脉络及知识框架 [J]. | 技术经济与管理研究 , 2025 , (1) : 15-22 . |
| MLA | 何郁冰 等. "国内外颠覆性创新研究演进脉络及知识框架" . | 技术经济与管理研究 1 (2025) : 15-22 . |
| APA | 何郁冰 , 荆晶 . 国内外颠覆性创新研究演进脉络及知识框架 . | 技术经济与管理研究 , 2025 , (1) , 15-22 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
At the critical juncture of a new round of industrial revolution and scientific and technological revolution, it is vital for enterprises to rapid identify and deploy the potentially disruptive technologies in order to build sustained innovation competitiveness. Because technological innovation is by nature a continuous and endogenous selection and adoption process, the identification of disruptive technologies needs to be advanced in a continuous innovation process. Innovation adoption theory holds that innovation is a new idea, technology or practice that needs to go through a series of steps to be successfully adopted and implemented by enterprises, and emphasizes that innovation is a relative concept and whether it is adopted is relative. In this regard, based on the analytical framework of innovation adoption, this study integrates the identification and definition of disruptive technologies from the perspective of the relativity of innovation, deconstructs the innovation process of disruptive technologies and the process of market disruption, and embodies the interplay between technological innovation and market adoption, so as to identify disruptive technologies with different needs. Firstly, using BER-topic model and patent information mining techniques to obtain new technology functions and discontinuous technology standards in a phased manner to identify the internal characteristics of innovation of disruptive technologies; secondly, using the CD index to measure the disruptive potential of patents to identify the external characteristics of innovation of disruptive technologies; and finally, a method is constructed to identify disruptive technologies based on the internal and external characteristics of innovation, and technologies that satisfy both the internal and external characteristics of innovation are considered disruptive technologies, and disruptive technologies are categorized into new market disruptive technologies, low - end disruptive technologies, and high - end disruptive technologies. In order to test the feasibility of the identification method, this paper uses the patents in the energy storage field as an example. The identification process of disruptive technologies in energy storage is analyzed step by step according to the technical functions and technical standards of the internal features of the innovations, and the calculation of the CD index of the external features of the innovation. Examples are also given to illustrate the identification process of different disruptive technologies. In addition, the technological advancement index and the Incopat value index are used to further verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the identification method proposed in this paper. Notably, in the energy storage industry, technological innovation and market application pay different attention to technical standards, and technical standard innovation is easier to realize than technical function innovation. This paper introduces the perspective of innovation adoption and combines the innovation characteristics and market value of disruptive technology, which enriches the theory of disruptive technology identification. Taking the field of energy storage as an example, this paper proposes a valuable method which could distinguish different types of disruptive technology, to identify disruptive technology through the combination of technology innovation and market adoption. Moreover, the identification method in this paper advances the prediction of disruptive innovation to the stage of technology identification, achieve pre - analysis to a certain extent, and identify which type of technology will lead to changes in the market in the future, providing a reference for enterprises to determine whether a new technology has a disruptive impact. This paper not only makes up for the traditional deficiency from the single perspective to explore the issue of disruptive technology identification, but also provides a new insight for disruptive technology emerging and diffusion. The conclusion has also important enlightenment for the disruptive innovation strategy of Chinese enterprises and the construction of scientific and technological powerhouse of China. © 2025 Editorial Department of Studies in Science of Science. All rights reserved.
Keyword ：
BERTopic BERTopic CD index CD index disruptive technology identification disruptive technology identification innovation adoption innovation adoption patent text mining patent text mining
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | He, Y.-B. , Xu, M.-J. , Jing, J. . Research on the identification of disruptive technologies based on innovation adoption; [基于创新采用框架的颠覆性技术识别研究] [J]. | Studies in Science of Science , 2025 , 43 (1) : 66-78 . |
| MLA | He, Y.-B. 等. "Research on the identification of disruptive technologies based on innovation adoption; [基于创新采用框架的颠覆性技术识别研究]" . | Studies in Science of Science 43 . 1 (2025) : 66-78 . |
| APA | He, Y.-B. , Xu, M.-J. , Jing, J. . Research on the identification of disruptive technologies based on innovation adoption; [基于创新采用框架的颠覆性技术识别研究] . | Studies in Science of Science , 2025 , 43 (1) , 66-78 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
基于创新采用的分析框架,从创新的相对性出发,提出了一种同时满足创新的内部特征和外部特征的颠覆性技术识别方法.首先,分别使用BERTopic主题模型、专利信息挖掘技术获取新技术功能、不连续的技术标准,识别颠覆性技术的创新内部特征;其次,使用CD指数衡量专利的颠覆性潜力,识别颠覆性技术的创新外部特征;然后,识别出同时满足创新内部和外部特征的颠覆性技术,划分出新市场、低端和高端的颠覆性技术;最后,以储能领域专利为例,验证识别方法的可行性和有效性.该方法能将颠覆性技术的定义与识别进行匹配,体现出技术创新和市场采纳的相互作用,区分不同类型的颠覆性技术,为企业确定一项新技术是否产生颠覆性影响提供了参考.
Keyword ：
BERTopic BERTopic CD指数 CD指数 专利文本挖掘 专利文本挖掘 创新采用 创新采用 颠覆性技术识别 颠覆性技术识别
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | 何郁冰 , 徐美娟 , 荆晶 . 基于创新采用框架的颠覆性技术识别研究 [J]. | 科学学研究 , 2025 , 43 (1) : 66-78 . |
| MLA | 何郁冰 等. "基于创新采用框架的颠覆性技术识别研究" . | 科学学研究 43 . 1 (2025) : 66-78 . |
| APA | 何郁冰 , 徐美娟 , 荆晶 . 基于创新采用框架的颠覆性技术识别研究 . | 科学学研究 , 2025 , 43 (1) , 66-78 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
The emergence of disruptive innovation is an important and highly researched field. In the context of innovation ecosystem, the acquisition and its evolution of ecosystem legitimacy is an effective mechanism for start-ups to successfully carry out disruptive innovation. Prior research has shown that disruptive innovation is a socialized process that involves collaboration and dynamic interaction of multiple actors. Therefore, start-ups usually need to be embedded in a suitable innovation ecosystem for acquiring relevant resources and capabilities, in order to realize disruptive innovation through value co-creation. However, startups that introduce disruptive innovations into an existing ecosystem usually face the liability of newness including customer indifference, incumbent skepticism, and lack of co-specialized assets, which will undermine the efforts and effects of disruptive innovations carried out by start-ups. As a result, in order to successfully carry out disruptive innovation, start-ups usually have to acquire ecosystem legitimacy, that is, to obtain the support from actors inside and outside the ecosystem or even incumbents that may be disrupted. However, it is worth considering that there is currently a lack of relevant research on how start-ups in emerging economies achieve disruptive innovations through acquiring ecosystem legitimacy. Although the last few years have seen a boom in the study of the relationship between innovation ecosystem and disruptive innovation, most of that are usually based on the assumption that disruptive innovation has already occurred. Existing research focus mainly on the strategic response of incumbents to the challenge of being disrupted, with fewer studies analyzing the ecosystem legitimacy of disruptive innovation carried out by start-ups. Using the method of longitudinal case study, this paper explores the detailed process of how start-ups in emerging economies achieve disruptive innovation by acquiring the ecosystem legitimacy. According to the principle of theoretical sampling, Fuzhou Maixin Biotechnology Development Co., Ltd. was selected as the case study sample. First, Maixin Biotechnology has successfully achieved disruptive innovation and realized the transition from entrepreneur to leader. Second, Maixin Biotechnology has finally disrupted or partially replaced the existing ecosystem value proposition by constructing the ecosystem legitimacy. Moreover, Maixin Biotechnology has greatly enhanced its disruptive innovation capability through the ecological legitimation strategies. Through the longitudinal case analysis of Maixin Biotechnology from 1993 to 2023, this paper finds that Maixin Biotechnology builds an innovation ecosystem around a disruptive value proposition, and constantly overcomes various obstacles to ecosystem legitimacy during this period, so as to gradually get the understanding and recognition of internal and external actors of the ecosystem. By acquiring ecosystem legitimacy, Maixin has ultimately succeeded in disrupting or partially replacing the value proposition of existing innovation ecosystems. In the process of building innovation ecosystems to carry out disruptive innovation, the ecosystem legitimacy construction of start-ups has experienced a dynamic evolution from performative legitimation, cognitive legitimation to value proposition legitimacy. Accordingly, start-ups could acquire ecosystem legitimacy through the phases of behavioral legitimization, discursive legitimation, and meaningful legitimization in that order. This paper introduces the perspective of ecosystem legitimacy which enriches the disruptive innovation theory of start-ups in emerging economies. Based on the context of Chinese startups, this paper proposes a formation path of disruptive innovation through the acquisition of ecosystem legitimacy. This paper not only makes up for the traditional deficiency from the single perspective of incumbents to examine disruptive innovation, but also provides a new mechanism for disruptive innovation of Chinese start-ups. The conclusion has also important enlightenment for the disruptive innovation practice of start-ups in emerging economies and the construction of scientific and technological powerhouse of China. © 2024 Editorial Department of Studies in Science of Science. All rights reserved.
Keyword ：
disruptive innovation disruptive innovation ecosystem legitimacy ecosystem legitimacy innovation ecosystem innovation ecosystem start-ups start-ups
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | He, Y.-B. , Ye, L.-F. , Wang, Z.-W. et al. How start-ups successfully carry out disruptive innovation: A case study based on the perspective of ecosystem legitimacy; [创业企业如何成功开展颠覆性创新? ———生态系统合法性视角的案例研究] [J]. | Studies in Science of Science , 2024 , 42 (10) : 2216-2227 . |
| MLA | He, Y.-B. et al. "How start-ups successfully carry out disruptive innovation: A case study based on the perspective of ecosystem legitimacy; [创业企业如何成功开展颠覆性创新? ———生态系统合法性视角的案例研究]" . | Studies in Science of Science 42 . 10 (2024) : 2216-2227 . |
| APA | He, Y.-B. , Ye, L.-F. , Wang, Z.-W. , Lin, Q.-X. . How start-ups successfully carry out disruptive innovation: A case study based on the perspective of ecosystem legitimacy; [创业企业如何成功开展颠覆性创新? ———生态系统合法性视角的案例研究] . | Studies in Science of Science , 2024 , 42 (10) , 2216-2227 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
PurposeDisruptive innovation is regarded as an important engine of the new technological revolution, which can change the traditional market structure and business model completely. Articles on disruptive innovation remain fragmented and heterogeneous in terms of theoretical paradigms and empirical studies. For the purpose of further understanding about disruptive innovation, and to recognize its evolutionary trajectory and research trends, this paper provides a systematic literature review.Design/methodology/approachBased on data from Web of Science a total of 1,415 articles were collected to identify productive countries, prominent journals, influential authors and main sub-fields on disruptive innovation. Additionally, important articles are analyzed for content.FindingsThere is an overall increasing trend in the number of articles, a uniformity of highly productive authors and countries and a primary concentration in business and management journals. Moreover, six research clusters are identified and an antecedent-decision-outcome framework is constructed to categorize significant studies.Practical implicationsThis paper outlines the key focuses of the field: application and adoption of disruptive technology, identifying and responding to disruptive innovation, commercialization of disruptive technology, disruptive innovation strategies and disruptive business models.Originality/valueThis paper combines bibliometrics and content analysis to systematically overview disruptive innovation research.
Keyword ：
Bibliometric Bibliometric Disruptive innovation Disruptive innovation Intellectual structure Intellectual structure Review Review
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | He, Yubing , Jing, Jing . Intellectual structure of disruptive innovation: a bibliometric analysis and systematic review [J]. | JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT , 2024 , 37 (6) : 1382-1402 . |
| MLA | He, Yubing et al. "Intellectual structure of disruptive innovation: a bibliometric analysis and systematic review" . | JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT 37 . 6 (2024) : 1382-1402 . |
| APA | He, Yubing , Jing, Jing . Intellectual structure of disruptive innovation: a bibliometric analysis and systematic review . | JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT , 2024 , 37 (6) , 1382-1402 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
在创新生态系统情境下,生态系统合法性的获取及演化是创业企业成功开展颠覆性创新的有效机制.通过对迈新1993-2023年的纵向案例分析发现,创业企业通过生态系统合法性实现颠覆性创新的过程,实际上是创业企业围绕颠覆性的价值主张构建创新生态系统,并不断克服各种生态系统合法性障碍,逐步得到创新生态系统内外部行动者的理解和认可,最终实现对现有生态系统价值主张的颠覆或部分替代的过程.在此期间,生态系统合法性经历了"规范""认知"和"价值"维度的演化,并依次通过"行为""话语"和"意义"合法化策略获取相应的合法性.研究结论对于创业企业成功开展颠覆性创新具有重要见解.
Keyword ：
创业企业 创业企业 创新生态系统 创新生态系统 生态系统合法性 生态系统合法性 颠覆性创新 颠覆性创新
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | 何郁冰 , 叶凌峰 , 王志玮 et al. 创业企业如何成功开展颠覆性创新? [J]. | 科学学研究 , 2024 , 42 (10) : 2216-2227 . |
| MLA | 何郁冰 et al. "创业企业如何成功开展颠覆性创新?" . | 科学学研究 42 . 10 (2024) : 2216-2227 . |
| APA | 何郁冰 , 叶凌峰 , 王志玮 , 林齐心 . 创业企业如何成功开展颠覆性创新? . | 科学学研究 , 2024 , 42 (10) , 2216-2227 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
针对颠覆性技术的侵蚀性与不确定性特征,结合复杂网络与演化博弈理论,设计了基于复杂网络的演化博弈模型,运用计算机仿真方法对颠覆性技术扩散特点进行考察.结果表明,颠覆性技术在新兴企业之间的扩散具有相对稳定性,但对在位企业之间的扩散表现出不可预测性;技术颠覆潜力和侵蚀能力的提高均无法保证颠覆性技术的完全扩散;网络结构特征对颠覆性技术的扩散效果影响显著.
Keyword ：
复杂网络 复杂网络 技术扩散 技术扩散 演化博弈 演化博弈 颠覆性技术 颠覆性技术
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | 何郁冰 , 林欣慧 . 基于复杂网络演化博弈的颠覆性技术扩散研究 [J]. | 软科学 , 2024 , 38 (6) : 28-36 . |
| MLA | 何郁冰 et al. "基于复杂网络演化博弈的颠覆性技术扩散研究" . | 软科学 38 . 6 (2024) : 28-36 . |
| APA | 何郁冰 , 林欣慧 . 基于复杂网络演化博弈的颠覆性技术扩散研究 . | 软科学 , 2024 , 38 (6) , 28-36 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
基于联盟组合多样性构成视角，探讨联盟组合中“伙伴—功能—治理”多样性对企业持续创新的影响，以及结构洞、互补资产对二者关系的调节作用，并利用2013—2017年101家中国深市创业板上市公司面板数据进行实证检验。结果表明：伙伴多样性、功能多样性和治理多样性对企业持续创新具有不同程度的影响；互补资产正向调节功能多样性与持续创新的关系，对“治理多样性—持续创新”关系发挥负向调节作用；结构洞负向调节功能多样性与持续创新的关系，对“治理多样性—持续创新”关系发挥正向调节作用。
Keyword ：
互补资产 互补资产 持续创新 持续创新 结构洞 结构洞 联盟组合多样性 联盟组合多样性 调节作用 调节作用
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | 何郁冰 , 占加峰 . 联盟组合多样性对企业持续创新的影响 [J]. | 科技进步与对策 , 2024 , 41 (05) : 60-69 . |
| MLA | 何郁冰 et al. "联盟组合多样性对企业持续创新的影响" . | 科技进步与对策 41 . 05 (2024) : 60-69 . |
| APA | 何郁冰 , 占加峰 . 联盟组合多样性对企业持续创新的影响 . | 科技进步与对策 , 2024 , 41 (05) , 60-69 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
基于生态效率视角将产业创新生态系统创新流程划分为同化、生长和利用三个阶段,构建产业创新生态系统效率评价指标体系,运用Super-SBM模型和Malmquist指数法对中国15个高技术产业创新生态系统效率进行测度,并提出相应的提升路径.研究结果表明:中国高技术产业创新生态系统效率处于中等水平,总体呈持续增长趋势,产业间差异性和两极化现象显著,需进一步协同发展;三个阶段效率差异明显,利用效率最高,生长效率次之,同化效率最低,演化趋势中,同化效率增长速度最快,利用效率次之,生长效率最慢(负增长);结合产业分阶段效率的差异性发现,“双三高”效率产业尚未形成,无法发挥“创新生态效应”的引领推动作用;中国高技术产业创新生态系统效率可表征为高效率-快增长、低效率-快增长、低效率-慢增长、高效率-慢增长四种类型,不同类型产业可通过流程优化式、机制完善式和双边突破式等路径提升创新生态系统效率.
Keyword ：
中国高技术产业 中国高技术产业 创新生态系统 创新生态系统 动态效率 动态效率 提升路径 提升路径 静态效率 静态效率
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | 何郁冰 , 张思 , 林婷 . 中国高技术产业创新生态系统效率测度及提升路径研究 [J]. | 系统工程理论与实践 , 2024 , 44 (02) : 546-562 . |
| MLA | 何郁冰 et al. "中国高技术产业创新生态系统效率测度及提升路径研究" . | 系统工程理论与实践 44 . 02 (2024) : 546-562 . |
| APA | 何郁冰 , 张思 , 林婷 . 中国高技术产业创新生态系统效率测度及提升路径研究 . | 系统工程理论与实践 , 2024 , 44 (02) , 546-562 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Abstract ：
Based on the perspective of ecological efficiency, this paper divides the innovation process of industrial innovation ecosystem into three stages: Assimilation, growth and utilization, and constructs an evaluation index system of industrial innovation ecosystem efficiency. The Super-SBM model and Malmquist index method are used to measure the innovation ecosystem efficiency of 15 high-tech industries in China, and relevant efficiency improvement paths are proposed. The research results show that the efficiency of China’s high-tech industry innovation ecosystem is at a medium level, with an overall trend of continuous growth. The differences and polarization among industries are significant, and further coordinated development is needed. There are significant differences in the efficiency of the three stages, with the highest utilization efficiency, the second highest growth efficiency and the lowest assimilation efficiency. In the evolutionary trend, the assimilation efficiency has the fastest growth rate, utilization efficiency is the second, and growth efficiency is the slowest (negative growth). Combined with the difference of industrial efficiency in different stages, it is found that the 'double three-high' efficiency industry has not yet formed, which cannot play the leading and promoting role of 'innovation ecological effect'. The efficiency of China’s high-tech industry innovation ecosystem can be characterized by four types: high efficiency - fast growth, low efficiency - fast growth, low efficiency - slow growth, and high efficiency - slow growth. Different types of industries can improve the efficiency of innovation ecosystem through process optimization, mechanism improvement, and bilateral breakthrough. © 2024 Systems Engineering Society of China. All rights reserved.
Keyword ：
Ecosystems Ecosystems Efficiency Efficiency Optimization Optimization
Cite：
Copy from the list or Export to your reference management。
| GB/T 7714 | He, Yubing , Zhang, Si , Lin, Ting . Research on efficiency measurement of China’s high-tech industry innovation ecosystem and its improvement path [J]. | System Engineering Theory and Practice , 2024 , 44 (2) : 546-562 . |
| MLA | He, Yubing et al. "Research on efficiency measurement of China’s high-tech industry innovation ecosystem and its improvement path" . | System Engineering Theory and Practice 44 . 2 (2024) : 546-562 . |
| APA | He, Yubing , Zhang, Si , Lin, Ting . Research on efficiency measurement of China’s high-tech industry innovation ecosystem and its improvement path . | System Engineering Theory and Practice , 2024 , 44 (2) , 546-562 . |
| Export to | NoteExpress RIS BibTex |
Version ：
Export
| Results： |
Selected to |
| Format： |
