To　tackle　the　absence　of　health　assessment　mechanisms　and　the　irrational　maintenance　cycles　at　distribution　stations,　a　comprehensive　evaluation　method　is　introduced,　integrating　a　conflict　resolution　mechanism　for　group　decision-making　differences.　First,　the　method　sets　up　an　indicator　system　and　an　expert　evaluation　framework,　featuring　a　novel　binary　conflict　measurement　function　to　quantify　overarching　conflicts.　Subsequently,　expert　correction　factors　are　devised　using　metrics　like　falseness,　credibility,　and　usability　of　expert　evaluations　to　enhance　the　D-S　evidence　theory.　This　adjustment　facilitates　the　weighting　of　evaluation　indicators　through　the　aggregation　of　various　expert　opinions.　Also,　an　improved　GRA-TOPSIS　model　is　established,　integrating　grey　relational　and　distance　closeness　to　yield　a　comprehensive　closeness,　improving　TOPSIS’s　one-sided　criteria.　Finally,　this　approach　calculates　the　overall　closeness　between　each　station’s　evaluation　value　and　the　ideal　solution,　accurately　reflecting　its　health　status.　Experimental　analysis　reveals　that　this　method　effectively　reconciles　conflicts,　differences,　and　uncertainties　in　expert　evaluations,　offering　more　precise　and　sensible　assessment　outcomes,　thus　providing　valuable　guidance　for　maintenance　decision-making.　©　2024　Power　System　Protection　and　Control　Press.　All　rights　reserved.