Indexed by:
Abstract:
The authors regret that we have identified some small mistakes (mainly due to the accidental presentation of results from an older FDS version) that do not affect any conclusions of the work but are deemed sufficiently important to require correction. We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience caused. Corrigendum Section 3: The first sentence ‘The CFD simulations have been performed with Fire Dynamic Simulator (Version 6.7.9).’ was corrected to ‘The CFD simulations have been performed with Fire Dynamic Simulator (Version 6.7.9), except for Group I in Table 1, which were obtained with FDS Version 6.7.0.’. Corrigendum Fig. 4: The result from FDS 6.7.0 is updated as follows. And the sentence ‘the delay time [Formula presented] = 3.9 s and the time constant T = 2.4 s can be obtained’ was corrected to ‘the delay time [Formula presented] = 3.800 s and the time constant T = 2.554 s can be obtained’.[Formula presented] Corrigendum Table 2: The title ‘Table 2 Summary of PID parameters in different HRRs’ was corrected to ‘Table 2 Summary of PID parameters in different HRRs (obtained from FDS Version 6.7.0)’. And the kd value of 10 kW fire was corrected to 1.265. Corrigendum Fig. 8: The legend of 10 kW fire (Green line) in the printed version (kp = 0.446, ki = 0.077, kd = 0.848) was taken by mistake, which should be kp = 0.872, ki = 0.150 and kd = 1.265. The green line in Fig. 8 is also updated as follows.[Formula presented] © 2024 Elsevier Ltd
Keyword:
Reprint 's Address:
Email:
Source :
ISSN: 0379-7112
Year: 2024
Volume: 146
Language: English
3 . 4 0 0
JCR@2023
Cited Count:
SCOPUS Cited Count:
ESI Highly Cited Papers on the List: 0 Unfold All
WanFang Cited Count:
Chinese Cited Count:
30 Days PV: 0
Affiliated Colleges: