Nonlinear　response　time-history　analyses　are　used　in　well-known　seismic　performance　assessment　methods　such　as　Incremental　Dynamic　Analysis,　Multi-Stripes　Analysis　and　Cloud　Method　to　describe　the　relationship　between　chosen　Damage　Measure　versus　Intensity　Measure.　Numerous　researches　have　presented　simplified　procedures　or　nonlinear　static　procedures　to　develop　fragility　over　the　last　two　decades.　In　NSPs,　pushover　analysis　is　used　to　assess　the　system　capacity,　and　response　spectra　quantify　the　seismic　demand.　In　addition　to　the　known　ones,　Incremental　Modal　Pushover　Analysis　(IMPA)　is　a　novel　nonlinear　static　procedure　that　has　been　proposed　in　recent　years　and　is　used　in　this　study　to　advance　an　IM-based　fragility　estimation.　The　accuracy　and　effectiveness　of　various　vulnerability　assessment　methods　are　investigated　by　comparing　fragility　curves　obtained　from　MPA-based　Cloud　Analysis,　IMPA,　Cloud　Analysis　to　IDA　fragility　curves.　The　results　from　two　relatively　small　bins　of　record　motions　differing　by　ranges　of　Joyner-Boore　Distance　and　are　scattered　across　a　range　of　Magnitude　are　presented.　©　The　Author(s),　under　exclusive　license　to　Springer　Nature　Switzerland　AG　2024.