In　landscape　planning　and　policy-making,　environmental　sounds　have　only　negative　impacts　on　human　health.　The　natural　sounds　that　promote　healthy　and　supportive　environments　remain　neglected.　Although　the　soundscape　concept　and　approach　have　considered　natural　sounds　as　a　resource,　the　related　knowledge　has　not　been　employed　in　landscape　planning　yet.　The　purpose　of　this　study　is　to　advance　existing　state　of　knowledge　to　synthesize　common　preferences　for　soundscape　resources,　and　then　to　propose　an　assessment　method　for　landscape　planning.　We　introduce　a　planning-oriented　soundscape　resource　evaluation　framework　to　guide　a　PRISMA　systematic　literature　review.　The　review　includes　an　in-depth　analysis　of　74　peer-reviewed　journal　articles　and　a　meta-analysis　for　21　of　them.　We　find　that　(1)　current　research　has　under-explored　the　soundscape　with　regard　to　spatiotemporal　evolution,　health　benefits,　and　preferences　and　values;　(2)　in　green　spaces,　people　from　different　sociocultural　contexts　exhibit　common　preferences　for　soundscape　resources.　According　to　these,　soundscape　formal　characters　tend　towards　naturalness,　diversity,　and　appropriateness;　(3)　exposure　to　natural　sounds　does　have　positive　effects　on　human　health　and　well-being,　but　the　degree　of　the　effects　was　varied.　In　addition　to　birdsongs　and　water　sounds,　wind-induced　vegetation　sounds　also　have　high　values.　Based　on　these　findings,　we　suggest　basic　natural　sound　scores　and　categorized　indicators　for　evaluating　NSES.　It　can　be　implemented　in　Geographic　Information　System　to　produce　place-based　and　comparable　results　under　uncertainty.　The　results　can　help　landscape　planners　better　consider　the　contribution　of　the　acoustic　environment　to　human　health,　well-being,　and　quality　of　life,　protect　the　areas　of　high-quality　soundscape　resources　without　actual　human　uses,　and　reveal　the　differences　between　the　actual　provision　of　aesthetic　values　and　demands　for　nature-based　recreation.　©　2022