In　order　to　reduce　greenhouse　gas　emissions,　China＇s　provinces　have　issued　a　series　of　carbon　emission　trading　policies　in　recent　years.　As　China＇s　first　ecological　civilization　demonstration　zone,　Fujian　Province　has　also　promulgated　an　array　of　carbon　emission　trading　policies.　Therefore,　deeply　analyzing　the　classification　of　carbon　emission　trading　policies　in　Fujian　Province　is　of　great　reference　value　for　other　regions　to　formulate　carbon　emission　trading　policies.　This　paper　first　introduces　the　textual　formulation　of　the　carbon　emission　trading　policies　in　Fujian　Province,　and　subdivides　the　relevant　policies　into　17　types　of　policy　instruments　as　per　the　classification　criteria　of　mandatory,　hybrid,　and　voluntary.　Besides,　it　also　classifies　and　codes　the　instruments　involved　in　the　Fujian　provincial　carbon　emission　trading　policies　using　social　network　analysis　method,　with　a　total　of　107　social　network　actors　obtained.　On　this　basis,　the　differences　in　the　composition　of　various　policy　instruments　are　to　be　compared　and　analyzed.　The　Results　show　that　the　proportions　of　mandatory　policy　instruments,　hybrid　policy　instruments,　and　voluntary　policy　instruments　are　54.20%,　36.45%,　and　9.35%,　respectively.　The　policy　instruments　used　by　the　Fujian　provincial　government　are　dominated　by　mandatory　and　hybrid　policy　instruments,　and　the　voluntary　policy　instruments　account　for　a　relatively　low　proportion.　Currently,　what　the　Fujian　government＇s　carbon　emissions　trading　policies　focus　on　is　to　improve　the　supervision　and　accountability　mechanism　so　as　to　form　a　complete　carbon　emission　trading　supervision　and　management　system.　In　the　process　of　building　a　carbon　emissions　trading　market,　the　government　of　Fujian　Province　should　strengthen　policy　support　for　talent　cultivation,　carbon　credit　evaluation　system　construction,　and　policies　support　for　projects　in　finance,　and　reinforce　the　construction　of　voluntary　certification　emission　reduction　mechanism　in　a　timely　manner,　with　a　view　to　encouraging　the　participation　of　social　forces　in　the　construction　of　the　carbon　emissions　trading　market.　©　2019　The　Authors