Indexed by:
Abstract:
Hydrologic basin models are generalizations of natural hydrologic processes and inevitably contain multiple uncertainties in the simulation of rainfall-runoff events. These uncertainties typically include input uncertainty, model structure uncertainty, and model parameter uncertainty. The input uncertainty is divided into rainfall calculation uncertainty (RCU) and precipitation forecasting uncertainty. For model parameter uncertainty, there are only a few parameters in a hydrologic basin model that make significant contributions to flood forecasting so that only the probability distribution functions of those sensitive parameters need to be evaluated. In this study, a new method of RCU assessment is derived using an inverse sampling gauge (ISG) approach, in which the influencing factors of the RCU are addressed in the calculated area precipitation and standard deviation. Additionally, the coefficient of variation-Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency measure (CV-NS) method is introduced to identify the sensitive parameters of a hydrologic model. The methods of ISG and CV-NS are tested in Huangnizhuang Basin, China, in the evaluation of the RCU and the parameters uncertainty of the Xinanjiang model. It is indicated that the ISG method is useful in RCU estimation by deriving the conditional probabilistic distribution of areal precipitation, and the CV-NS method is effective and simply in the operation of sensitive parameters' identification. In addition, the continuous ranked probability skill score (CRPSS) is employed as an indicator to show the relative performance of predictions. Three probabilistic predictions considering different sources of uncertainties are conducted and compared with the deterministic prediction. The results of the comparisons suggest that predictions considering one or more uncertainties have higher predictive performance than the deterministic one. Moreover, main source of uncertainty can be identified by the results of CRPSS among different probabilistic predictions. In this study area, the model parameters' uncertainty is the main uncertainty. © 2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
Keyword:
Reprint 's Address:
Email:
Source :
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
ISSN: 1084-0699
Year: 2019
Issue: 12
Volume: 24
1 . 5 9 4
JCR@2019
2 . 2 0 0
JCR@2023
ESI HC Threshold:150
JCR Journal Grade:3
CAS Journal Grade:4
Cited Count:
SCOPUS Cited Count:
ESI Highly Cited Papers on the List: 0 Unfold All
WanFang Cited Count:
Chinese Cited Count:
30 Days PV: 1
Affiliated Colleges: