In　3D　video　transmission,　the　user　Quality　of　Experience　(QoE)　can　be　greatly　affected　by　network　congestion　or　packet　errors.　In　case　of　durable　impairment　within　a　view,　the　user-end　could　skip　its　impaired　frames,　or　compensate　its　frames　from　the　other　view,　or　degrade　its　image　resolution　to　ensure　playback　continuity.　These　operations　have　the　inevitable　leverage　to　Frame　Loss　(FL),　Frame　Compensation　(FC)　and　Quality　Fluctuation　(QF).　In　this　work,　we　compare　the　monocular　and　binocular　impacts　of　FL,　FC　and　QF　on　the　user　QoE　of　3D　High　Definition　(HD)　videos.　Among　them,　the　QF　is　shown　to　be　the　preferable　choice　for　subjects.　We　hope　our　findings　could　benefit　the　improvement　of　3D　HD　video　transmission.